testclub_

Who's accountable for the outputs?

Specification-led security testing for APIs and AI systems. We find the flaws that scanners are structurally unable to find.

// Fuzz attack surface representation

AI System Testing

01 · SPECIFICATION

Poor products are rarely the result of bad code or poor testing. Rather they result from specification not being written precisely enough. If nobody defined what the system should do in a given case, that simply gets missed. Most defects, most security breaches, and most AI failures trace back to this, not to mistakes in code.

02 · API SECURITY

The API layers of digital applications are often a huge attack vector, but these load-bearing structures can be the least scrutinised area. Business logic flaws don't show up in automated vulnerability scans. An API must be deeply understood before we can creatively discover where the genuine vulnerabilities are.

03 · AI INPUT/OUTPUT

Who is taking responsibility for the quality of the outputs from your AI application? Inputs are not limited to chatbot interfaces and direct prompting. Are you defining what good looks like and how much variance is acceptable in your system's outputs? Are you checking this at scale?

Who

Testclub was founded in 2012 by Omar El Dali, built on twenty-five years at the boundary between specification and implementation, across trading platforms, fintech, insurance, health, energy and government.

A skilled high-agency group who move fast and adapt to what your project actually needs. Every finding arrives with its evidence and the method that produced it, so an engineer can follow every step.

Meet the team →

// Fuzz attack surface representation